HMRC uses resources to combat tax evasion at sea. Those who get caught by HMRC should expect hefty fines of up to 200% of the tax debt and a higher tax bill than when the voluntary taxable person discloses or uses the agreement between Britain and Switzerland. In certain circumstances, tax evaders are prosecuted. HmRC has not announced an amnesty by then and the text of the agreement states that none are amnestied. The risk remains that if HMRC contacts you before the entry into force of the Swiss agreement, you cannot opt for the single tax and you may be subject to an intrusive investigation into your tax affairs. The UK government has signed a pioneering agreement with the Swiss government on the taxation of undeclared Swiss bank accounts. This guide answers a few questions about the agreement. The Swiss agreement is an opportunity to settle a person`s tax affairs (concerning Swiss assets) while possibly preserving anonymity. Account holders should also consider other available options, including the Liechtenstein Publishing Facility (DFL), as there may be a better solution. The agreement between the UK and Switzerland was developed to encourage individuals to resolve their tax issues, but it is not a disclosure function. Taxpayers with other irregularities in their tax affairs should consider the inclusion of the Liechtenstein Disclosure Facility (DFL). The UK-Switzerland agreement offers the opportunity to become tax compliant, but may not be the best option for all account holders. Any UK person with a bank account, trust or business in Switzerland is affected by the agreement.
Swiss banks will check their documents in order to identify such persons. If banks do not have up-to-date information about their customers, account holders can be contacted if they do not meet the relevant criteria. You must contact the Bank in order to avoid the single tax described above. If you have money in a Swiss bank account and have not reported the income or winnings generated in that account to HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), you will likely be affected by the agreement. Even if you have declared the income and profits from your Swiss bank account, you may also be affected. The agreement constitutes a change in the way banking is carried out in Switzerland and further advice should be sought with regard to your particular circumstances. Account holders who do not act (see below) will subject their Swiss bank account to a direct debit, even if the income and profits have been reported to HMRC. The agreement will allow HMRC to obtain information on the designated persons, which is an extension of the current position. I understand that the Swiss Bankers Association (SBA) says that the agreement only concerns residents of Des. I have a home in Britain and other countries.
Do I have my residence within the meaning of the Swiss agreement? HmRC, in its frequently asked questions about the deal, confirmed that it would be possible to pay the one-time direct debit on one account, but disclose another account, provided that the two accounts are separate accounts. It confirms that sub-accounts are automatically processed in the same way as the main account. HMRC has reached an agreement with the Swiss tax authorities. The agreement allows for close cooperation between the UK and Switzerland and there is an important exchange of information between the two countries. The agreement provides for a historic tax on Swiss funds held by UK residents, who hold up to 34% of the balance in an account from 31 December 2010 or 31 December 2012. UK residents with Swiss accounts can also be subject to a WHT of up to 48% on their accounts. With regard to inheritance tax, Swiss paying agencies are obliged to withhold 40% of taxes or to carry out publicity in the event of the death of a data subject, as well as other measures. On 6 October 2011, the United Kingdom and Switzerland signed and published the text of their tax agreement for United Kingdom residents with accounts in Switzerland (hereinafter referred to as “the Agreement”). The publication of the agreement is good news as it offers a welcome clarification of a number of issues that (as stated in our previous Stop Press of 13 September 2011) were unclear from previously published information.
. . .